- Category: Zoj
- Published on 13 April 2013
- Hits: 46
On 14th April 2011 passed away Juraj Majchrák – former judge, Vice-President of the Supreme Court SR, a longtime President of the Association of Judges in Slovakia and signatory of the initiative For Open Judiciary (ZOJ). He achieved in his life what many of us only desire – natural reverence and respect at home and abroad. He connected the work of a judge with the efforts to transform Slovak judiciary into an independent and credible judiciary.
The way to achieve this goal is still very far. There is lack of distinctive personalities in the jury, such as was Juraj, who would be able to motivate and convince the judges that just as important as the performance of decision-making activities of a judge is also responsibility for the judiciary as a whole, for its professional and moral standard. When in the '90s Association of Judges in Slovakia fought for the adoption of legislation that would make the judiciary indeed the third power in the state, Juraj as its representative had always been associating the requirements with the responsibility of judges for the performance of the judiciary.
We have achieved a lot, something we have already lost. Our credibility in society is low enough and the answer why this is so are different between the judges themselves. When we began to fight for the new face of justice in the '90s, most of the judges were as on the same ship. We thought that we are on one side of the barricades against the executive branch, which has no interest in strengthening our position and powers. However, in parallel with the way we seemed to succeed to achieve the status of judges, which e.g. the judges Czech Republic were jealous of, the process of internal decay of our apparent unity started. Although judges seized, among other things, leading positions in the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Council, it did not lead to the strengthening of our position and respect in society. The result is rather the opposite.
Juraj liked to use one unnamed author's statement "There is not enough darkness to put out the light even from the smallest candle." There's a profound truth. The problems will not go away if we do not speak about them loud. And if we do not start to solve by ourselves the problems that most people can see, someone else will have to deal with them for us. And sooner or later, the will issue us a bill...
In a newspaper interview in 2004, Juraj said "Evil is allowed by decent people who are silent." He knew what he was talking about and the judges knew it as well. The situation has not changed much since then. Most decent judges are still quiet, even if there is the need to speak.
Judge Juraj Majchrák will not come between us anymore. He will not speak in the way typical for him, when all of a sudden everything seems clear and convincing and proposed solutions acceptable. His legacy, however, remained here and it is important to remember.
So that we do not remain those decent judges thank to whom the things we do not agree with can happen in judiciary.
14th April 2013
JUDr. Juraj Babjak
- Category: Archive
- Published on 05 June 2012
- Hits: 576
I am pleased to invite you to the elections of eight members of the Judicial Council of the Slovak Republic I convoked to 29 May 2012.
Despite several legal opinions I guarantee to you that the elections will be held in accordance with the Constitution of the Slovak Republic. Each of you had the option to candidate in accordance with the constitutional conditions and each of you has the right to take part in the elections.
We have the right to decide in secret vote about the future development in the judiciary during the forthcoming five years. This is a unique chance for us judges to choose the way because we stand at the cross roads. There is one way I continuously stress and it is the guarantee of independence of judges, material coverage for fluent performance of the judicial position, right to legal opinion and fulfilment of the international judicial standards for judges. I will not repeat the unquestionable facts when the politicians decreased wages with promotion and support of some of us, when justice ministers made press conferences on decisions of judges in cases they were not aware of at all, they publicly informed about filed disciplinary motions against judges. This is the other way, because there are colleagues who cooperated and supported projects with the aim to subordinate judiciary to the politicians, when we are the only public actors who guarantee our functions by our property what was unique in the whole European Union and in the civilised world. That is why I will on Monday use my judicial right and I will go to vote.
- Category: Archive
- Published on 08 February 2012
- Hits: 548
A report „The Slovak Judiciary: Its current state and challenges“ by Lukasz Bojarski, polish lawyer and member of the Polish National Council of Judiciary; and Werner Stemker Köster, investigating judge at Rotterdam Discrict Court, who became the special reporter for Slovakia of The Nederlands Judges for Judges Foundation in 2009. Made on request from Open Society Foundation.
- Category: Archive
- Published on 14 December 2011
- Hits: 626
Harabin [Supreme Court chairman] is vengeful and he misuses his powers, say Supreme Court judges.
The situation at the Supreme Court allegedly resembles the totalitarian era of fear before 17 November [1989, when communist regime began to collapse in former Czechoslovakia]. A handful of judges who have taken the liberty to criticize the chairman, Stefan Harabin, have decided no longer to keep silent and have spoken out about bullying and the circumvention of the law committed, as they say, by Harabin. Not only can they not further their education, go on official trips, and adjudicate cases that are interesting, but they have recently been swamped with an amount of work with which one cannot cope without causing delays. This is to be ensured by a new work schedule for the next year that Stefan Harabin has prepared for them. It is said to be a "thank you" for a recent article published in this weekly, in which we reported that the Supreme Court chairman had failed to let judge Berthotyova attend an international conference in Prague. Even the US ambassador to Slovakia had unsuccessfully intervened in the matter.
The Supreme Court has rejected the above interpretation, though.
- Category: Archive
- Published on 21 November 2011
- Hits: 626
A judge critical of Harabin [Supreme Court chairman] cannot go on official trips and she feels persecuted.
The situation at the Supreme Court resembles the times of the totalitarian communist regime [in former Czechoslovakia], when disobedient individuals were not allowed to fulfill themselves professionally and ended up cleared away to the most inappropriate positions. Elena Berthotyova, a signatory of the [judges] appeal entitled For an Open Judiciary and also a Supreme Court judge, has not been able to travel to any expert conferences and seminars and she is not even allowed to give lectures. This is because all of the above is subject to approval by Supreme Court Chairman Stefan Harabin, who has long denied it to the judge. Most recently, he did not let her attend the Global Forum on Public Administration and Combating Corruption in Prague, where she was to lecture and lead a thematic panel. Even the US ambassador to Slovakia intervened in the matter with a letter. However, Harabin remains adamant and he has not even replied to the ambassador.